Boycott of Starbucks to launch on Valentine’s Day: End “open carry” gun policy
on
Starbucks’ Love for Guns Prompts Gun Victims’ Advocate Group to Launch Nationwide Boycott on Valentine’s Day 2012
CHICAGO, IL.: A nationwide boycott of Starbucks stores and its products will be launched on Valentine’s Day 2012. Its goal is to eliminate the risk of guns in public places and ultimately to bring sane gun laws to the U.S.
This boycott is being called by the National Gun Victim’s Action Council (NGAC), a network of representatives of 14 million gun victims, the faith community — including the Episcopal Peace Fellowship, United Church of Christ, Fellowship of Reconciliation — and secular groups working to reduce gun violence and many of the organizations that support passing sane gun laws.
WHY STARBUCKS?
Currently, Starbucks allows guns and assault weapons to be openly carried in its stores (in 43 states) and concealed and carried in its stores (in 49 states) (See Photos). Starbucks’ compliance with the National Rifle Association’s Pro-Gun Agenda was exposed in 2010 when members of the “open carry” movement began meeting in popular chains, such as California Pizza Kitchen, Peets, IKEA, Disney and Starbucks openly carrying their handguns and assault rifles. (Types of Guns)
To protect their customers and employees, all of the retail chains — except for Starbucks — banned guns from being carried in their stores.
“Starbucks allowing guns to be carried in thousands of their stores significantly increases everyone’s risk of being a victim of gun violence,” says Elliot Fineman, C.E.O. of the NGAC. “Open and conceal and carry are among the reasons there are 12,000 gun homicides each year in the U.S. If we had England’s gun laws we would expect 375 gun homicides each year — 97% less than we have. England’s gun laws are based on protecting public safety, ours on maximizing sales for the gun industry.” (Non-Sane Gun Laws)
Starbucks has the legal right to ban guns, but despite having been petitioned by thousands, asked at a shareholder meeting, and a direct appeal made to their Board, Starbucks clings to this policy that puts millions of Americans at risk every day and encourages the spread of guns being carried in public.
IMPACT OF STARBUCKS BOYCOTT
Fineman says, “Starbucks steadfast support of the NRA’S lethal pro-gun agenda damages its “socially conscious company” brand. Further,” adds Fineman, “Monte Carlo Simulation risk analysis indicates that 90% of the time, our boycott will reduce Starbucks stock price by an amount no rational company would allow.”
According to NGAC, the boycott will end when Starbucks rejects the NRA’s pro-gun agenda by banning all guns from their stores and committing to be an Aggressive Corporate Advocate for sane gun laws.
TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STARBUCKS BOYCOTT: http://gunvictimsaction.org/starbucks-boycott/
ABOUT NGAC: The National Gun Victims Action Council is a 501(c)(3) non-profit network of representatives of 14 million gun victims, survivors, their families, supporters, the faith community, secular organizations working on gun violence reduction and ordinary people leveraging their economic (buying) power to change America’s gun laws. NGAC can be found at www.gunvictimsaction.org.
Fellowship of Reconciliation Press Contact: Shauen V. T. Pearce






To whom it may concern:
I am writing to express my dismay. I walked into my parish in Royal Oak Michigan today to find your political propaganda as a bulletin insert. This kind of political activity should be done outside of the parish especially when the premise is a lie designed to incite fear.
While I hope reasonable people can agree on ways to improve gun laws in this country, it seem ironic to me that your protest is designed to attack a company that allows people who are NOT breaking any laws to gather in their establishments. What is most ironic about this is these are the people most likely to take responsible gun ownership seriously.
In reading your web post above what I see is that you are not actually looking to be reasonable about improving gun laws but rather would ban your fellow citizens from owning guns altogether. This too is ironic as the guns already exist. The guns are already out there. A ban on legal ownership simply means law abiding citizens will not be allowed to own guns. The people you should be worried about will still have their guns.
As for me, I will be enjoying my Starbuck’s while I look into a local Conceal and Carry class. Good luck with your protest.
Eric Babcock
Vestry Member St. Johns Eps. Church Royal Oak MI
I just came back from a trip to Starbucks, where I enjoyed a nice cup of hot chocolate (I rarely drink coffee). While I was there, I asked the manager to pass on my thanks to their senior management for their policy on law-abiding armed citizens being permitted to enjoy the food and beverages sold at Starbucks. I am a retired police officer, and have been carrying a firearm for over 40 years. I whole-heartedly disagree with your goal of totally dis-arming law-abiding citizens.
I will continue to carry my firearm (as the law permits me to do), and will continue to support Starbucks and any other business that supports me and my right to defend myself, my family, and the law-abiding citizens of my community.
You are wrong in what you are trying to do, and I hope you fail. It is unfortunate that you cannot see the truth.